<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Psychcf&#039;s blog &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://psychdesigns.net/blog/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://psychdesigns.net/blog</link>
	<description>Stuff &#039;bout programming, the web, linux, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:55:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>My thoughts on Google Chrome (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://psychdesigns.net/blog/2008/09/my-thoughts-on-google-chrome-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://psychdesigns.net/blog/2008/09/my-thoughts-on-google-chrome-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychdesigns.net/blog/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so I tried out Chrome. It&#8217;s pretty damn fast. If it&#8217;s that fast on linux, I&#8217;m going to be very happy. I also like how the UI is very condensed. It has some quirks with javascript stuff though.
I also saw something weird involving dijit.Menu, I think those are artifacts of iframes being shown.

Anyways, it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Ok, so I tried out Chrome. It&#8217;s pretty damn fast. If it&#8217;s that fast on linux, I&#8217;m going to be very happy. I also like how the UI is very condensed. It has some quirks with javascript stuff though.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I also saw something weird involving dijit.Menu, I think those are artifacts of iframes being shown.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://psychdesigns.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3BzeWNoZGVzaWducy5uZXQvYmxvZy93cC1jb250ZW50L3VwbG9hZHMvMjAwOC8wOS9zY3JlZW5zaG90LnBuZw=="><img class="size-medium wp-image-21 alignnone" title="screenshot" src="http://psychdesigns.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/screenshot-300x139.png" alt="" width="300" height="139" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Anyways, it&#8217;s nice. The dom could be a bit faster, but it&#8217;s not bad.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I wonder if they&#8217;ll use the native UI toolkits for OSX and Linux.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Anyways, I still don&#8217;t see the point.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Update:</strong> I&#8217;m kinda agreeing with <a href="http://psychdesigns.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5sdW5kdWtlLmNvbS93cC10cmFja2JhY2sucGhwP3A9MTY4" target=\"_blank\">this post</a> as well&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Update #2:</strong> interesting&#8230; there&#8217;s some weird stuff going on in <a href="http://psychdesigns.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL25ld3MuY25ldC5jb20vODMwMS0xMzg2MF8zLTEwMDMwNTIyLTU2Lmh0bWw/cGFydD1yc3MmYW1wO3N1Ymo9bmV3cyZhbXA7dGFnPTI1NDctMV8zLTAtMjA=" target=\"_blank\">their ToS</a>&#8230;</p>
 <img src="http://psychdesigns.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=19" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://psychdesigns.net/blog/2008/09/my-thoughts-on-google-chrome-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My thoughts on Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://psychdesigns.net/blog/2008/09/my-thoughts-on-google-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://psychdesigns.net/blog/2008/09/my-thoughts-on-google-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychdesigns.net/blog/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, for those that don&#8217;t already know, Google&#8217;s working on a new browser called chrome. To be honest, I don&#8217;t see the point. Each tab having it&#8217;s own process is unnecessary, if anything the renderer should have a seperate thread. Firefox already has ubiquity, which is in-the-works. Firefox 4 will have a javascript VM. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, for those that don&#8217;t already know, Google&#8217;s working on a new browser called <a href="http://psychdesigns.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2Jsb2dvc2NvcGVkLmNvbS9hcmNoaXZlLzIwMDgtMDktMDEtbjQ3Lmh0bWw=" target=\"_blank\">chrome</a>. To be honest, I don&#8217;t see the point. Each tab having it&#8217;s own process is unnecessary, if anything the renderer should have a seperate thread. Firefox already has ubiquity, which is in-the-works. Firefox 4 will have a javascript VM. I can see the point in sandboxing each plugin, but that&#8217;s the only good point I see. Why is google making their own browser, when they could just as easily pay some firefox devs to get what&#8217;s already planned done faster?</p>
<p>Update: John Resig posted <a href="http://psychdesigns.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2Vqb2huLm9yZy9ibG9nL2dvb2dsZS1jaHJvbWUtcHJvY2Vzcy1tYW5hZ2VyLw==" target=\"_blank\">his reaction</a></p>
<p>Update #2: And so has <a href="http://psychdesigns.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2FsZXguZG9qb3Rvb2xraXQub3JnLzIwMDgvMDkvdGhlLWltcG9ydGFuY2Utb2YtY2hyb21lL3RyYWNrYmFjay8=" target=\"_blank\">Alex Russel</a>.</p>
<p>Even after reading the two responses, I still don&#8217;t seem to get it. The cartoon I read talks about how the architecture is superior, but Alex&#8217;s post is talking about how chrome is getting back to the content part of the web. Maybe I&#8217;m missing something here.</p>
<p>Update #3: I&#8217;ve read <a href="http://psychdesigns.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2dvb2dsZWJsb2cuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLzIwMDgvMDkvZnJlc2gtdGFrZS1vbi1icm93c2VyLmh0bWw=" target=\"_blank\">the post</a> on the google blog now. I&#8217;m still confused, but it seems that it&#8217;s trying to provide a clean un-cluttered browser. I don&#8217;t think we need that, if anything I think the browser should become smarter, and do things involving microformats. Eh, I&#8217;ll wait until tomorrow until I make my final decision on weather or not it&#8217;s necessary.</p>
 <img src="http://psychdesigns.net/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=3" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://psychdesigns.net/blog/2008/09/my-thoughts-on-google-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
